Sign up here to
receive our e-alerts





E-mail this page to a friend

The Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act, also known as Proposition 36, was passed by 61% of California voters on November 7, 2000. This vote permanently changed state law to allow first- and second-time nonviolent, simple drug possession offenders the opportunity to receive substance abuse treatment instead of incarceration. Proposition 36 went into effect on July 1, 2001, with $120 million for treatment services allocated annually for five years. [more]

 

Proposition 36 Programs Remain – Funding In Doubt
 
 

On November 4, Californians failed to pass Proposition 5, the Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act (NORA), which would have significantly expanded treatment-instead-of-incarceration in the state – including Proposition 36. What does the failure of Prop. 5 mean? It means that Prop. 36 remains the state’s largest treatment-not-jail program, and that protecting its funding is more important than ever. [More]

 
Gov Proposes Alcohol Tax to Fund Treatment
 
 

Just weeks after finally reaching agreement on a 2008-09 state budget (and just two days after the state went to the polls), the governor proposed an ambitious plan to keep the state afloat. The plan combines spending cuts and tax increases – including an increase in excise taxes on alcoholic beverages. [More]

 
Seven Years Later: California's Prop. 36
 
 

Check out this great poster that sums up just some of what Prop 36 has meant for California in the last eight years! Download it and share it!

 
Proposition 36: Improving Lives, Delivering Results
 
 

DPA released a report this week documenting the successes of Proposition 36, the California initiative that mandates treatment instead of incarceration for most people convicted of nonviolent drug possession offenses. The report, entitled Proposition 36: Improving Lives, Delivering Results, found that Prop 36 had significant benefits for substance abuse treatment as well as reforms to the state's costly prison system.
[read more]

 
 
 

Read about what Prop 36 graduate, Oliver H. thinks about Prop 36 and how it could be improved.

Success Stories

Check out Marc's success story.

Prop 36 in the News

A Million Bucks or Addicts Face Jail Time Instead of Treatment, Santa Barbara Independent [05/29/08]

Former Addicts Pass Milestone, Tracy Press [05/14/08]

Make a Good Tool Against Drugs, Alcohol Better, Sacramento Bee [04/02/08]

Drug Program Grads Celebrate the Clean Life, Monterey County Herald [03/28/08]

The Politics of Addiction, San Diego City Beat [01/29/08]

More Arrests But Fewer in Jail, The Union [01/24/08]

Projects to Persist Despite Big Cuts, Ventura County Star [11/18/07]

End of Denial, Beginning of Life, Lake County Record Bee [09/27/07]

Meth Crisis Discussed at Town Hall Meeting, Mercury Register Online [09/20/07]

Hundreds Turn Out for Meth Town Hall, Mercury Register Online [09/19/07]

Prop. 36 Evangelist, San Diego City Beat [08/20/07]

Remaking Prisons, Los Angeles City Beat [08/09/07]

The Promise of Prop. 36, San Francisco Chronicle [05/23/07]

In Time of California's Prison Crisis, Prop 36 is Solution, California Progress Report [05/11/07]

Prison Deal Won't Do the Job, North County Times [05/01/07]

 

 
Common Sense for Drug Policy
 
California Society of Addiction Medicine
 
California State Association of Counties
 

Read commentary from Oliver H., a Prop 36 graduate.

 
Get the Facts
Over a dozen Proposition 36 fact sheets are available for download. Topics include: the Effectiveness of Drug Treatment, Drug Courts/Deferred Entry, and the California Correctional System.
 
County-by-County
breakdowns of the 2000 initiative votes
 
For background on the Prop. 36 campaign and other votes nationwide for drug policy reform, see:

Contact Lists
County Lead Agencies
and Contacts
Parole Region Contact
Probation Contacts

 

     

 
HOME | ABOUT PROP 36 | REPORTS | PRESS RELEASES | NEWS | FAQ | TREATMENT NOT JAIL
Drug Policy Alliance · (916) 444-3751 · sacto@drugpolicy.org