June 1, 2005 |
|
E-mail
this page to a friend |
Fourth Anniversary
of Californias Popular Treatment
Instead of Incarceration Initiative
(Prop. 36)
Tens
of Thousands Have Received Treatment
for the First Time: Landmark Initiative
Saves Money and Reunites Families
New Legislation Will Determine Its
Future
People Whose
Lives Have Been Changed by Prop.
36 Available for Interviews (See
Bios Below)
|
Contact: Tony Newman
(646) 335-5384 or Glenn Backes (916)
202-2538 |
As the four year anniversary
of Proposition 36 approaches this July 1,
the human impact of the groundbreaking law
is being seen in tens of thousands of families
all around California. Graduates of the
program are speaking out about how the voters'
approval of the treatment-not-incarceration
law led directly to positive changes in
their own lives. Inspired by their own experiences,
many graduates are going back to the treatment
centers that helped them, sharing their
stories in order to inspire other clients
to succeed. Others have become substance
abuse counselors themselves.
With three bills now
pending in the Legislature that would
affect Proposition 36, the voices of these
graduates are increasingly important.
Without Prop. 36, the only thing
that would have gotten me off drugs would
have been an overdose, said William
Evans, a veteran who picked up his 20
year addiction to methamphetamine while
in the Navy.
Californias landmark
Proposition 36 initiative, passed by an
overwhelming majority of the states
voters in 2000, has helped tens of thousands
of non-violent drug offenders to get access
to treatment for the first time. Despite
the popular initiatives clear winsboth
economic and social vested interests
that benefit from skyrocketing incarceration
rates have continued to fight the proposition.
A bill drafted by prosecutors, narcotics
cops and a judge who opposed Prop 36,
and introduced by Senator Denise Ducheny
of San Diego, would radically overhaul
Prop. 36 by jailing drug addicts who are
currently being treated as a result of
that initiative.
The voters gave
us treatment instead of incarceration,
and only the voters can take it away,
said Glenn Backes of Drug Policy Alliance,
If cops and politicians try to lock
up nonviolent drug users instead of providing
treatment, then we will stand with the
families of Prop. 36 graduates to defend
them in Sacramento and in the courts,
if need be.
The graduates profiled
below are all available for interviews,
please contact Tony Newman at (646) 335-5384.
William, Los Angeles,
51
William had been to jail
before, but it had never helped him kick
the 20 year methamphetamine addiction
he picked up while he was in the Navy.
The last time he was in court, he thought
they would send him back behind bars,
but they offered him treatment through
Prop. 36. He took the treatment option,
and after two years clean and sober, he
says that without Prop. 36, the only thing
that would have gotten him off of drugs
would have been an overdose. Bill credits
Prop. 36 with giving him a second chance
at marriage and at raising his children.
Bill is now a repair maintenance worker
for commercial buildings. He is happy
to have a bank account, a car and a family.
He believes Prop. 36 and lots of prayer
helped him find his way.
Gary, Riverside, 49
Gary used drugs for 30
years before he was able to turn his life
around. He had lost job after job, as
well as his home, and was living in a
tent in a canyon when he was picked up
on possession charges and offered the
choice between years in prison and treatment
through Prop 36. Gary was 47 when he entered
treatment for the first time in his life.
It was a life or death situation
for me, he said, if I went
back to drugs again I would not have made
it. After completing an outpatient
program, he was able to move in with his
daughter and meet his grandchildren for
the first time. Gary has two granddaughters
who are ages four and seven and a new
eight month old baby grandson who he is
able to see all the time. He graduated
from Prop 36 in February of 2003, and
he now has his driver's license, owns
two vehicles, has a job and rents an apartment.
He just received a promotion to become
a manager at an Auto Repair Shop. He continues
to attend the 12 step program that provided
him with support after he finished his
residential treatment, and now leads sessions
there.
Jayne, Sacramento,
54
Jayne started experimenting
with drugs when she was 12 in the 1960s.
Before entering Prop 36, she had never
been to treatment and never thought she
had a problem. On her third arrest for
drug possession, she became the first
person in Sacramento County to enter the
Proposition 36 program; she was not the
first to graduate. At first Jayne struggled
in treatment; in her mind Prop 36 was
something she had to complete to go on
doing what she wanted to do using
drugs. Jayne dropped out of the Prop 36
program until she was arrested again.
When she entered Prop 36 for the second
time, Jayne finally told her counselors
that she was having trouble and needed
more help. She entered residential treatment
on July 9th of 2002 and has been clean
ever since. Jayne credits Prop 36 with
turning her life around and is dedicated
to giving back to the program. She became
the alumni coordinator for Proposition
36 graduates as she and other graduates
felt the need to lend support to people
entering the program, and she now coordinates
alumni talks. Jayne warns that Prop 36
does not always work the first time; it
did not work the first time for her, but
it has given her her life back. She has
reconnected with her family after years,
and is now working full time as a registered
nurse.
Paul, Sacramento,
42
Paul has been clean and
sober for three years, since he entered
treatment under Proposition 36 on May
19th, 2002. He had struggled with drugs
since he was 17, and had bounced in and
out of jail and prison throughout his
life, but his stints behind bars never
stopped his addictionin fact sometimes
they made it worse. Drugs are in
every prison, he said. And
since I wanted them, they were easy to
find. He had also tried treatment
before, but it had never worked for him.
But when he entered Prop. 36, he was finally
ready for a change. Prop 36 made
the critical difference because the counselors
and probation officers really worked with
me. Even though I never relapsed, I felt
comforted knowing that there was support
to fall back on if I did struggle and
that they would not send me straight back
to jail, Paul said. After graduating
from his Prop. 36 program, Paul returned
often to the treatment center that had
helped him to speak as an alumnus. Because
of his efforts, his program began an alumni
program where graduates speak to people
entering the program about their experiences.
Paul is now closer to his teenage children
than he has ever been before, and he volunteers
to raise money for their high school.
He is also very active in his own community,
and recently built a fence for a neighbor:
he is trying to make up for lost time.
Tammy, Sacramento,
43
Tammy is currently completing
her final class before taking the board
exam for her California Alcohol and Drug
Abuse Counselor Certification. Tammy struggled
with a heroin addiction and also used
crack cocaine. She started using drugs
when she was 14 and quit when she was
40 when she entered treatment for the
first time in her life through Prop 36.
She had just been released after serving
her second prison sentence for drug possession,
and had immediately returned to her old
habits and was re-arrested. I know
that if it wasnt for Prop 36 I would
either be in jail or dead right now,
she said. Tammy emphasizes that once people
are offered treatment they are able to
work on their underlying problems. This
April Tammy celebrated her third year
clean. Prop 36 has allowed me to
become a parent again, a daughter, a sister,
an aunt, a cousin, a neighbor, she
said. She has two children ages 25 and
6. Her sons now call her every day to
tell her they love her. She lost custody
of her youngest son while she was addicted,
but is now working towards reuniting with
him.
See
more press releases |